Skip to main content

About your Search

20130302
20130310
STATION
SFGTV 181
LANGUAGE
English 181
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 181 (some duplicates have been removed)
SFGTV
Mar 5, 2013 10:30am PST
of it. those are true but i don't think that the law requires them to do it. if you go to rec and park and they ask you for something that is really at the labor department or the mayor's office that they will say we don't have that but we should go to the other city office but on those two, there is at least potentially, an agency responsibility and under as the head of the agency, have that responsibility and what would it take even if there were a failure to respond that day what would make it willful? since he had appointed a staff, responded himself in a timely way? as we do these, i just think that we are going to have a series of these kinds of questions. >> commissioners? studley pointed exactly the point that is troubling me because i think that mr. ginsberg himself did conduct the search and there were no responsive documents so i do understand that technically, the answer was correct and he responded in the way that the ordinance contemplates but at the same time, what troubles me about this particular instance is that the request came in only a few weeks after the event occ
SFGTV
Mar 7, 2013 1:00pm PST
federal law and a long tail of history. they were guaranteed have been guaranteed under the fair law that the changes to their retirement programs would have to be negotiated. so they found reformat this summer enacted by the state of california to violate that and they have used that to hold up hundreds of millions of dollars of transit grants across the state and i believe that san francisco muni is affected by this, so consequently, this bill will go in and exempt them from the reform act from last year. we recommended a watch, and i am not sure how this thing from fair early on and we want to to be monitoring it as we move forward and coordinate with sf muni. and also on the matrix, 8164, initially we recommended watch and we are going to switch our recommendation to you today to oppose this measure, it is the law that this bill effects is a little used local private partnership legislation that has been on the books since 1996. i am aware of only two enstances of its application, the bill heightens the requirements which makes the projects cost more and makes it more difficult,
SFGTV
Mar 5, 2013 9:30am PST
not an expert on the sunshine law and so please bear with me if some of my comments seem general. i wanted to point out one thing, mr. gingsberg asked for the city to be included in this meeting, but one of the first letters called on april 20th which he signs on the director of public affairs here is the san francisco rpd basically says that this is a deeply bias panel with no interest in discussing facts i am hopeful that you will cancel the panel and put on a more balanced approach. i mean that here we have basically using the official title, the city employee highly paid up in the department, basically requesting a private club that puts on a lot of controversial presentation to scotch this one. and that is the pattern here. the underlying pattern is the number of city officials, paid employees as well as city commissioners basically went out of their way to use their official titles, and approach a private entity in discourage a public meeting on public affairs. and they did it by basically saying, these people are unqualified, these people are bias, these people will insight the publ
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 2:30am PST
of the minutes. that is what the law says and the reading of it says that and that is what is ruled. >> in the case that we are actually talking about, which is the second case on here, which i then took or i asked for the library commission discussed it and said can we do this and mr. herrera said you can and the city attorney said that it is okay and they decided to discontinue and disregard the order of the task force. i then brought the case against specifically mr. herrera and under the facts and findings of fact and conclusions of law, the task force stated specifically that the task force further noted that the statement should be in the body of the minutes to prevent the public officials from unlawfully abridging critical public comment. >> at that point, and i made dozens of points before the library commission for which he extended and i asked you to look at the law and read the law and determine what it means to you and look at the who decisions that have been issued by the task force saying that in the minutes means that in the body of the minutes and stated why they did
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 5:30am PST
to proceed through all of the other ones. because i am hearing suppositions being made not based on the law, i think that it the law would do this or this law should do this or i am hearing those kinds statements instead of referring to the law as it applies. mr. gibner you are wrong, we have document storage, whether it is stored at iron mountain or dt in a back up system it is the same thing and there is a requirement for retention and when or wherever that retention is, it must be requested no matter what the location is. whether there is no policy, or it is not a matter of policy, the law specifically states that the retrieval of those records must be had whether they are in a person's hand or not. whether they are in storage or someplace else. the only thing that can't be retrieved are ones that can be destroyed. okay? those are the only ones. now, if you are going to take the retention policy, as the law, that is even more concerning because you have not even determined whether it is correct or not. and i stated under section 8.8 actually, used all of 8, that most of this, is embellis
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 5:00am PST
the document retention policy itself complies with the law, i mean if it doesn't, that is obviously a huge problem and one that parks is going to have to rectify. but for the narrow question i don't know if we need to reach that question. >> i don't know if you are asking me, our office works with the departments on the record retention policies to insure that they comply with the admin code and the requirements of the state law. so, i can say yes, the record retention policy complies with the record retention requirements in the state and local law. >> did you hear mr. wo lf's comments? were you here for that? >> yes. >> so, he was suggesting that perhaps administrative code 8.1 defines records in a way that would encompass the documents that can be deleted under category four. >> i think admin code section 8.1, attempts or explains the universe of documents that you are looking at and puts them into different boxes. and as to whether they need to be kept permanently, for some period of years, or they are really only current records just for use on the day, that can be destroyed or thrown
SFGTV
Mar 5, 2013 8:30am PST
of the most blatant victims. i started to submit citizen summaries right after the law went into effect, they created something called appendix a, even though there was no notice in the minutes themselves that there was an appendix, the type face was smaller than anything else in the minutes. s of course, they refused to include the appendix on the on-line version even though the minutes were submitted by e-mail. and after several years, i pointed out to the secretary, that the superior court had every case document on-line and after that, they put the appendix in a pdf and if you clicked the tiny link on the bottom there was no link back. finally, they stopped distributing the appendix with the draft minutes that are distributed to 250 people. it was not distributed to the commissioners and the public at the library meeting where they were approved. the only place that it was attached to the minutes was the two copies that went to the archive. at that point i stopped submitting them for a while and that was when i started beginning my public comments with stop the hate, stop the ignora
SFGTV
Mar 6, 2013 5:30pm PST
very proud of law enforcement stepping in. on february 6th, 2013, that the police commissioners meeting, last month, i gave you paperwork and spoke with all of you about fighting crime as i always do. i would like to thank you for listening and acting quickly. a lot of good police officers answered the call of duty and i want to salute them. i love hard core law enforcement. you guys took a big bite out of crime during the month of february. i want it to continue. i am very proud of law enforcement for stepping hard on crime. i urge you to continue with tough action, it has to be. once again, i say stop and frisk is a must and you know why. hard core law enforcement must continue all crime must be punished don't let anyone get away with anything. keep stepping hard on crime, it is needed on a 24-7 basis. and i know that you need this, i know that you know it, and i know that we need a budget that supports that as well. and i want you to understand that i seriously believe in tactical law enforcement. it is a must as well. and i know my time is almost up, but i want to give you this, jus
SFGTV
Mar 1, 2013 9:00pm PST
honda the issue of illegal units that pre dominate the city, a property owner under california law is not permitted to take rent from an illegal unit that is discourage from the tenant. when the property learns that he or she has an illegal unit, it is encumbent to take action. my client learned of the status of the units when he hired him when he came to the city and explained to him that he had a single family dwelling. he promptly did what was legally required of him to seek a permit to clarify the legal use of the property. if there is any suggestion, implications, thought, about limiting my clients' rights under state law as a condition of the permit. imposing some sort of rent control on this unit and limiting my rights to go out of the rental business. and i strongly urge you to seek legal, the case law is in favor of my client that the board cannot limit my clients rights under the rental housing right and the board does not have the authority to limit my client's right to go out of the rental business if that is his choice. and the suggestion that we agree to that is illeg
SFGTV
Mar 2, 2013 9:30am PST
-inlaws. down on caesar street. i was wondering isn't that against the law for them to do something like that. and the nitwit does not want to pay alimony but he will because he is make shoinger that no one can get in touch with me. i think that he is silly >> be careful with your taser. >> thanks. >> expect speaker? >> my name is vick preo from the marina and i think that the police do a wonderful job and thank you for making yourself open and available to us and the commissioner as well. we all have concerns, and one of those that we have is that they are trying to open the restaurant going on the up on the top, and it has a potential to attract a nuisance and what the police are going to do if this place opens up in a homeless move from the park to the marina green and what is going to happen now. probably once a month i will find sleeping on the street and the homes. we have had concerned and a cook of break-ins on the car and we did not walk in. and obviously we cannot get in the city. what we look forward to is when this place an attractive nuisance for the homeless and for anyone else.
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 4:30am PST
that i did not violate the law either, i think that is very, very convenient, basically you can't have someone giving you advice which you rely on totally and they are unwilling to be honest about the fact that they may be affected by the decisions that you make. and a simple fact that you say, oh, the city attorney can interpret these laws, the other bodies like the task force even though the law specifically says that they are the ones to interpret it, can't, is real hypocracy >> interpretation is allowed and then there can be different opinions, you can't say that the task force can't interpret it if the city attorney can. the task force can add to it but the city attorney can. >> even though in the law it says that the bodies to do it, and yet, the city attorney who has absolutely no right to do it, can do it not with a legal decision, but with simply writing a memo. >> good evening, commissioners my name is katherine howard i was one of the panelists at the common wealth club and i am member of the friends of the music club and the presidential alliance. i am a architect and i hav
SFGTV
Mar 4, 2013 7:30am PST
items no. 1. >> item no. 1, prohibit sales of law enforcement ammunition. no. 2, police code require reporting 500 or more round >> these two items have been introduce by mayorly and supervisor co-hen. >> thank you very much. thank you. as many of you know i have joined with chief and other leaders to announce this legislation late last year. this has built upon to take on gun violence. ammunition, lethal ammunition. what the law doesn't restrict is it's possession. now we also have existing regulation that require anyone selling ammunition within the city limits maintain records of their sale which are required to be available for inspection at any time. but no city law requires any reporting of these types of sales by vendors that do not have locations inside the city and county of san francisco but sell to city residents. this is enforcing our existing our regulations. the first proposes to restrict not only the sale but possession of type of ammunition that is in lethal property designed for use by military personnel. anything sold black talent which was designed with sharp pro
SFGTV
Mar 4, 2013 8:00am PST
rounds by anyone raises a flag to law enforcement. it's not uncommon to go through several hundred of rounds when you go to the range and it's also -- than it is to buy 50 round at a time. i would hope that the chief would be more concerned purchase by prohibited person than an arbitrary rounds by anyone. i fail to see what added benefit there is since vendors already require to maintain records of all sales. i don't see the added benefit. >> thank you, mr. green. next speaker please. >> good morning, supervisors. my name is don did you dutel. i have a question on this law. has there been a demonstration from the previous legislation that has helped law enforcement by the district attorney where we have people caught with firearms or even using firearms in the city and if this legislation can demonstration where it's filling some holes or something like that where people are getting off i believe all citizens would like to use that. i do have firearms. a definition that does affect sports man. it's very difficult to have components shipped to san francisco. there are many vendors
SFGTV
Mar 2, 2013 9:30pm PST
i am very, very proud of all of you that are signing onto support this law. i would like to offer an international perspective here. as a naturalized citizen in this country, i inherited the history of this country and that involves the good, the bad, and the really, really ugly. and as a political science major and history major, it [speaker not understood] me the interment of the japanese american and the japanese latino that we did in this country without due process of law. this is the history that i inherit in becoming an american. as an american, i also carry the burden of current events and current laws. and let me tell you where i was during /11. -- 9/11. * i was teaching american political science abroad in asia. and it was very, very difficult to explain to my students what was happening in guantanamo, holding people without the due process of law. coming back to america now for two years, it's amazing that we have to tell the government to obey the law? there is no debating that. it should be absolute silence in appreciation that we have a law in place already. >> thank
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 7:00pm PST
are breaking the law, the city is breaking its own laws, it is a city exempt from its own laws? >> they are breaking the law, time and time again, with the load limit law on the marina boulevard at area and the access and also, for the buses which bring people in and the last time when we had the golden gate bridge anniversary, i mean the city actually had muni bringing the buses up and down the streets which have an ordinance saying that you can't do that. and you know, i think that we need to respect our own laws. i think that the city needs to respect its own laws. and do something about this. but, every time citizens have brought up the issue of these renegade, passenger vehicles, these commercial vehicles, cap able of carrying eight or more passengers absolutely nothing is done, it is just a quality of life issue. but it is important to people who live in the marina. thank you. >> thank you. [ applause ] >> as the da makes his way up there, i know that commissioner loftus was the commissioner assigned to northern station and i was at first and the commissioner lives in the
SFGTV
Mar 5, 2013 10:00am PST
correspondence. what is not clear to me, having been involved in this area of law for many years is what the consequences are of failing to adhere to the department's retention policy. i recall in 1998, or prior to, putting the property g. amepdments on the ballot in 1999, there was a lot of discussion about what sections of the ordinance to amend and it was decided to only limit the amendments to chapter 67 to the sunshine ordinance, itself. so, that is why there is that new section that was read earlier that talks about the department heads maintaining records in a business like manner so as to not supercede section 8.1, of the admin code but to reinforce the notion that the departments needed to keep records that were required to be kept not keep phone messages from, you know, one spouse saying, you know, please pick up the milk at the grocery store. but, those things that related to the functioning of the city government needed to be kept in a business-like manner and it appears that did not occur here and i would encourage you to find for mr. wooding in this matter unless you have a
SFGTV
Mar 6, 2013 12:30am PST
the law, and one of the goals of our immigration laws is to create and provide for family unification. unfortunately, that does not currently apply to same-sex couples. federal law does not currently recognize permanent same height ~ same-second partners for [speaker not understood] law. [speaker not understood] and his or her foreign-born partner. right now those couple are not allowed to have the u.s.es are department or the u.s. citizen sponsor the foreign partner to apply for immigration benefits. ~ resident and as we are trying to enact comprehensive immigration reform, it is imperative that we include every, every individual. the inability to sponsor a same-sex partner has created many problems. it has led many couples to choose to remain in a costly long distance international relationship, to choose to live abroad in the foreign partner's country so that they can be together. and if permitted, to seek a visa independent of the partnership for the partner and then go through very antiindicated and very cumbersome process to allow the person to remain in the country. ~ antiquate
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 3:30am PST
, avaiding it, and i don't think that the law is intended to be something where they go along for two years, and only when mr. herrera has the chance of being found in willful violation, does he actually even show up at the hearings. he sends miss blackman to the hearings to represent him and that is the lowest and the biggest exhibit of lack of integrity, sending a subordinate to answer for your behavior. >> commissioner studley? >> i don't have any questions. i am prepared to speak to the issue when you are ready. >> okay. >> mr. hartz i have a question for you, assuming that a speaker says something during public comment, submits a summary that is radically different from the statement that they gave but submitted it as part of the summary. would it in your mind be satisfacotry to submit it? >> a summary is not the same words that were spoken, it is your interpretation of the words you spoke. and radically different is a very subjective term it is not an objective term. so, yes, if it was radically different, they could raise that argument. not once in 3 years, they have attempted to eit
SFGTV
Mar 5, 2013 4:00am PST
be preferable and we are looking for someone that we are defining as some kind of law experience. meaning, you know, whether it be law school or working even as a legal aid or something like that. this job as the commissioners know entails a fair amount of code and law working with the city attorney and other agencies, so, having someone come in who has some basic understanding of that it would be helpful. >> and then, everyone who has some kind of security, or code enforcement or law enforcement background is going to get pushed to the front of the line just because of the nature of the work. >> okay. >> any other questions commissioners? >> is there public comment on the executive director's report? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. >> item number four, police department comments and questions? officer, methias. >> a quite et reporting session and we will go over a few incidents that happened on broad way and columbus, there was an aggravated assault and the victim was stabbed six times at a parking lot across from the seller. looking into it, as far as what we know so far, there is
SFGTV
Mar 2, 2013 8:00am PST
on and impart of the board of the executive committee of the law center to present the gun violence and i have been working on the gun violence prevention issues in the last 20 years, i raised my son in the city and my heart is in san francisco. and so thank you again for being here tonight. >> thank you. >> commissioner loftus? >> i love to get to hear the fellow commissioners talk about themselves and the love of the city and it is wonderful. i'm native san franciscoan also. i live in the sun se. my husband and i are raising our three daughters in the city i am a former prosecutor with the san francisco district attorney office. and one of fast vorite things to do is to get to be the neighborhood prosecutor and so i am very familiar with the great community partnerships and the legacy of the chiefs who respect the community's ability to help to solve problems together and i think that is just really great about coming out to these meetings. for my day job, now, i, like dr. marshal, i work in the bay view for a non-profit for the center of youth wellness. where we are trying to improve the he
SFGTV
Mar 4, 2013 9:30pm PST
with all law enforcement mourns the loss of the two officers in santa cruise, it is always in our minds somewhere that these can come but the horrible tragedy that occurred down there was two veteran officers and their lives being taken senselessly while they are just doing their job to help the public. and i know that you all share in our just sense of loss for them. and obviously we have extended every, you know, effort of condolence and support and we will be there for the fellow law enforcement officers to get through and that a very difficult time for them. >> we are going to adjourn the meeting tonight in honor of the two fallen officers, and there is a brethren and a sisterhood and we are going to adjourn in honor of laren bufp baker and elizabeth butler who left extensive families and some of you may know sergeant butler played football and we will adjourn the meeting in their honor tonight and that is why the chief is wearing a black band over her badge this evening. >> any questions for the chief? >> thanks for the report. >> thanks very much, chief. >> call line item two b. >
SFGTV
Mar 5, 2013 11:00am PST
these laws exist that government activity and i don't know who said it, so i can't quote anyone, but i wrote it down, government activity be as transparent as possible. and everything that we heard tonight, was about government activity. thank you. >> president and commissioners, judy, coalition for san francisco neighborhoods. in my positions as president, of the coalition, i have been in almost in every supervisor's office in every aid's sitting down next to every aid and the mayor's aids, and i can tell you that i don't know of anyone outside of those testifying before you today that deletes e-mail. these guys keep everything on their desktop computers it is like they have a rely that says question mark? it is there. they keep it. in their inbox, i don't know why? but they do. they are the only people that don't. and on the second item, mr. buell reports that the common wealth club has other than golden gate park that there are no topics that the club has hosted and i would like to remind him and point out to you that perhaps a case for palestine could be considered a little bit more cont
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 6:30am PST
be that the city can provide those records under other laws, but it does not fit within the sunshine ordinance box. >> i see. okay. >> so what is the consequence of that? >> are you saying that the whole thing does not belong here? or belong or as to some things that are not in her own personal file. i just don't understand that. >> yeah, i mean, i think that the whole thing does not belong here. that what she is alleging, is not really a sunshine violation. because. >> what about the central control logs? >> well, so, sorry, it may be that there are documents that are not confidential, under any state or local law and do not disclose personal information that are sunshinable, and so in that, those documents, yes. it fits. >> okay. >> and you are saying that i am not going to give you your documents about you unless you can say that i will make them public and essentially that is totally contrary to her right of privacy and yet she has a right to those documents of the >> that is true. but this is the advice that we were provided by the city attorney's office and they were following what had previ
SFGTV
Mar 6, 2013 2:30am PST
. i never heard something like this such blatant disregard for the law, the initial dust problem and the police having to called out working without permits and ignoring the stop work orders. it is crazy, if you don't take action here, you need to take action, i can't believe this is happening. i think that it is very least you can revisit the issue and see if there is anything that you can do under the law to bring him to justice. this is just crazy. thank you. >> thank you. >> any other public comment? >> okay, seeing no other public comment, commissioners, i believe that the inspector duffy would like to come back? >> yes, please. >> yes, commissioners, just in answer to your question regarding the health department, we found something on the city website that is the health department do have a hazardous waste site assessment and mitigation and it is mainly for leaking underground storage types and developing in the historic landfill and sites with no contamination that be being mid gated on a basis, and i am not sure if that falls into that and i thought that i would share th
SFGTV
Mar 2, 2013 2:00am PST
are correct >> i kind of figured that out because we are not just talking about law and accounting jobs, but we are talking about the vast, or the whole number of people who would be in the office as part of their work even though they are working for a cultural institution or a medical institution. so with that regard, i think that we, you know our projections should remain at the high end. because i think that we should or we probably will at least be at the regional average and the reason that i say that is some of the things that the director brought up about the attractiveness about being in an urban area not to mention the emp itus from legislation which is directing us to have jobs near the transit in the population centers and the fact that auto traffic, travel is for your job is becoming very costly, and very unattractive to a lot of people and i can speak from experience having been in areas of the bay area during the week and trying to, you know, get from one place to another and it is not easy because of the amount of traffic on the roads if you are trying to drive. so a lot
SFGTV
Mar 6, 2013 5:00pm PST
department that challenged our able to provide top-notch law enforcement due to staffing and budget challenges. this past year we were expected to do more with less, and this expected to be the new normal. not only did we persevere, we excelled. we went into the neighborhoods and heard them. we lived through one of the busiest december in san francisco, and a good january and february, we can talk about that play-calling later. we were relatively unscathed for the mission district celebrating the world series. we pulled together as a team, with one common goal to keep the city safe. this took leadership not from the top down but from the streets up. the senior officers and lieutenants knowing what was needed. it took the captains to be sure that their teams were willing to work as one. and again keeping the city safe. we did it like the champions we are. like no other law enforcement can, san francisco's finest. as each of you move in your new role, you will have the technology of advancements that provided for us locally and regionally and around the world. and we have issued lapto
SFGTV
Mar 2, 2013 9:00pm PST
must be accountable. you as supervisors are accountable above all for our safety and our law. [speaker not understood] you are given tremendous power. you have a police department at your disposal. you have [speaker not understood]. you are accountable to the mayor for that. you are accountable to the district attorney for that. you are accountable to the state government and to the feds for your proper use of that. the president of the ndaa is accountable to nobody. he's already been accountable to the voters and that's it. the constitution provides that understood -- the founders understood it is in the state interest to kill somebody and they have in the constitution a provision called a bill of mark, marqe. i congratulate you and i hope you will urge the congress and the president to use their proper constitutional powers and have the killing done by congress where at least there is some accountability. thank you. (applause) >> thank you. thank you. next speaker. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is john [speaker not understood] and i represent an african university and keny
SFGTV
Mar 7, 2013 12:00pm PST
's same time. our job is easier, we regulate and enforce law and regulate and so we don't have to necessarily, they have the advocacy program and part of the equation in that kind of makes their job even more difficult. >> i would suggest and i would appreciate your comments, and i would suggest that there be in the near future a joint meeting of the police commission and the entertainment commission. i think that having that discussion and that level of discussion by the policy-making bodies of both entities is useful and helpful. i know as a police commissioner i found discussions at that level with agencies useful and i think that it is only something that can lead to a positive thing. and i would encourage and in fact, i will be asking those bodies to at least look into that, i think that discussion will be helpful. >> i think that it is a great idea and i think that it could happen. >> supervisor weiner? >> just to be clear, in my statement, having people in the street at night increases public safety, i was not suggesting that having thousands of people unload from clubs
SFGTV
Mar 7, 2013 3:30pm PST
of the -- what i read once you were [speaker not understood] you were above the law or above the rule. accidents happen, they happen to all of us. things do fall between the cracks, i understand that. so, for me i was interested in hearing if there was something that i was missing. and i didn't hear anything. and i am very happy to support your appointment today and i look forward to working with you. as you know, pier 70 is very important to not only san francisco, but critically important to the health and vitality to the [speaker not understood] waterfront in district 10. i imagine we'll be working together in that area. i am very encouraged by your business background, your real estate savvy and willing to negotiate contracts and deal. there is room on the port for a position, a person that has those skills. so, i look forward to working with you. thank you. >> supervisor breed. >> thank you. i also want to echo the comments of my colleague, supervisor cohen, especially with regards to mr. murphy's real estate experience which i think is truly important for a port commissioner along with a c
SFGTV
Mar 2, 2013 1:00pm PST
the law and that would be changing or considering entertainment and free speech. and i think that would be a hard road to get. so, i'm suggesting that we do form a subcommittee that might create some policy that this commission might look to as a requirement to make us happy. or requirement towards the conditions on a permit or something like that. but to do the research and talk to the city attorneys and talk to people in general and find out how you can do it within the framework of the existing law. is that okay with you? >> yeah. >> will you be on the committee? >> yeah. i would like to explore all option and come up with several options that would be possible. >> who else want to be? >> naomi? >> well, so we have two neighbor representatives just an over kill in it. >> i am not a neighborhood. >> i know that you are not. >> you are. >> why don't we do naomi and glendon and bryant, or steven? >> i am interested to see the proposed. >> steven you are in. >> on the broad way ad hoc we had two neighborhood represents. >> i am in. >> i prefer that it is three, i think that it is a deep
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 6:00am PST
. and i don't know i do not know the law on that. but, even if it he were, when he deletes it, it isn't, or if he can't find it, that, there is no referal for that, because, it would not default to a city it system. miss ballard's might even if she does not keep hers they go someplace else that is just a question mark. and there was some suggestions earlier about the memory. and this situation is confounded by the fact that it was so close in time to the exchange that we can imagine ourselves saying, but, i would have remembered why didn't they say so and go and look for them or say that there was a record but i can't find it. which might have been satisfying to at least know that there was an acknowledgment that there was such a thing. i am worried about trying to create a standard because the sunshine laws are not about who you remember, documents or information, or exchanges they are about production of records. and it would be so excruciating to draw the line between records that you could or should remember, and the records that were so long ago that or so part of a box that came
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 8:00am PST
to local law enforcement agencies to protect critical infrastructure, enhance the security. it's for protecting facilities like power plants, financial institutions, stadiums, utilities, things like that that are critical around the country and here in san francisco. and it pays for planning, equipment, training and other things [speaker not understood] law enforcement to [speaker not understood] critical facilities that we want to be sure nothing bad happens to. the original amount of this grant, the grant actually came to us in two parts. back in december 2011 the board approved a first amount of money for this grant which was about $200,000. and then a few weeks ago we got a call from homeland security saying they had an additional $82,000 did we think we could spend it and we said yes we can. so, that is what is in froth of you today. it is the additional 82 that they would like to give us. there was no local match required. it's free money for san francisco. there's no new positions created. and i'd be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you. colleagues, a
SFGTV
Mar 3, 2013 8:00pm PST
-- the camera or recording system that could help the law enforcement in this case the law enforcement doesn't seem to care so chief, i'm putting you on notice i know i'm your friend but do the right thing. mayor -- we can talk the talk time to walk the walk. those supervisors who come up and back the mta for the sake of backing the mta be educated on issues and to the public at home be very leery when you take m u.n. i is there a working camera before you board the bus thank you very much. >> thank you. if there are no other members of the public to comment we can close public comments. okay our actually -- this resolution is adopted. next item please. >> amendment 2009 strategic plan. this is an action item. >> any comments from colleagues i see none we'll go onto public comment public comment is open and if none come forward we'll close public comment this resolution is adopted next item please. >> this is an action item. >> colleagues, this resolution came forward unanimous consent from the committee to look at an executive recruit er firm and to have a director in by july 1st hope
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 181 (some duplicates have been removed)